FURTHER MISADVENTURES IN ADMINISTRATIVE EXCELLENCE
SCENE VIII: THE ETHICS REVIEW OLYMPICS
Every department competes to demonstrate procedural rigour.
Events include:
-
The Consent Form Sprint – who can circulate a 17-page consent form, collect signatures, and file it in triplicate first?
-
The Conflict-of-Interest Hurdles – leap over any personal, professional, or ethical conflicts without touching the floor.
-
The IRB Triathlon – proposal drafting, minor revisions, and self-flagellation on methodology all before lunch.
Winner receives:
-
A certificate of “Performative Ethical Excellence”
-
A voucher for one extra committee of your choice
-
Eternal peer recognition for procedural virtuosity
SCENE IX: DEPARTMENTAL POWER STRUGGLES (DISGUISED AS MENTORSHIP)
Mentorship sessions are held to guide new academics toward authentic compliance.
-
Each mentor must:
-
Remind mentees of hierarchical structures, without implying hierarchy
-
Evaluate their potential for publication, without stating expectations explicitly
-
Give feedback, without giving feedback
-
Mentees respond with:
“I feel supported, though unsure by what metric.”
Mentors nod gravely. The cycle continues.
SCENE X: THE GRADUATE STUDENT’S EMAIL QUEST
A PhD student must navigate interdepartmental email chains that are:
-
18 threads deep
-
Contain 72 attachments, 43 of which are redundant
-
Include 7 subcommittees commenting on a document never intended to be read
Each email ends with:
“Please review at your earliest convenience (or whenever ethical engagement permits).”
The student gains new skills in:
-
Contextual anxiety management
-
Decoding performative concern
-
Formatting citations in quadruple-checked compliance style
SCENE XI: THE TEACHING EXCELLENCE PERFORMANCE ART
Lecturers submit “evidence of teaching excellence” as:
-
Videos of themselves nodding thoughtfully while students speak
-
Annotated rubrics on rubrics
-
Graphs showing engagement without revealing actual engagement
Student evaluations are read aloud, line by line, at a committee gala, with applause only allowed when a metric aligns perfectly with departmental KPIs.
SCENE XII: THE DEPARTMENTAL RETREAT
Held in a room with:
-
Ergonomic chairs
-
Whiteboards for conflict resolution
-
A suggestion box for procedural anomalies
Activities include:
-
Icebreaker: Share Your Stress – participants are graded on vulnerability
-
Trust Exercise: Approve Without Question – a test of passive compliance
-
Closing Circle: Reflect on Reflection – followed by an email summarising all reflections, to be reviewed by a committee
Retreat is universally declared transformative, despite no one remembering what changed.
FINAL SCENE: THE EMAILS AT 4:59 PM
The day closes as usual:
“Reminder: Please submit:
Progress reports
Emotional labour logs
Evidence of ethical awareness
Minutes of informal hallway discussions
Failure to submit constitutes a minor procedural infraction.”
All sigh. All comply. Some smile faintly.
“It’s another day well-administered,” says the Chair.
And somewhere, buried beneath paperwork, a genuine idea tries to escape. It is politely reminded: submit first, innovate later.
