Plausible Pretentious Nonsense by ChatGPT

Here’s a passage of pretentious nonsense designed to sound plausible:

---

In the interstitial spaces of ontological discourse, where the synaptic firing of human cognition intersects with the metaphysical substrates of being, there emerges a profound tension between the subjective liminality of the self and the objective externality of the universe. This dialectical relationship, which I shall refer to as the “duality of presence,” transcends the typical Cartesian divide, unveiling a recursive loop where perception both shapes and is shaped by the very fabric of reality.

One cannot simply reduce this interaction to an empirical observation of cause and effect, for that would undermine the radical potential of the process itself. Rather, it is through a kind of epistemic inversion—a self-aware act of cognition in which one “unthinks” their own thoughts—that we begin to approach the true nature of existence, which is not a linear progression, but rather a rhizomatic intertwining of intentionalities.

In this schema, time is not merely a chronometric measurement, but an emergent property of the linguistic structures through which we articulate our subjective experience. The temporal flow is not constant, but variegated—its very texture a consequence of our collective semiotic engagements with the world. As such, the future is no longer conceived as a destination, but a vector, a set of possible realities that coalesce within the multi-dimensional field of consciousness.

Thus, one must eschew the archaic notion of singularity, not only in cosmological terms but in the very conception of selfhood. The self is not a monadic entity, but a constellation of fragmented, yet interconnected, identities, each reflecting and refracting through the lens of the other. In a sense, the individual becomes an illusion, an effect of the broader network of signifiers that perpetually circulate within the social-historical construct we label “reality.”

---

This should sound plausible enough to lull someone into a false sense of understanding while being essentially devoid of any meaningful substance. … Yes, that’s the trick with pretentious nonsense—it often has just enough structure to sound plausible and sophisticated, even if it doesn’t actually say much. It plays on abstract concepts and jargon to give the illusion of depth, while remaining deliberately vague and evasive about its actual meaning.