Matters Arising Within Systemic Functional Linguistic Theory And Its Community Of Users
Monday, 30 September 2019
Sharing The Dream
Monday, 23 September 2019
Monday, 16 September 2019
How To Be An Innovator In The SFL Community
Friday, 13 September 2019
When Is Emotion Not Affect?
When it is not used to enact the self or intersubjective relations through an interpersonal assessment. For example, the clause
She was surprised that the answer was thirteen
construes a process of emotion, but on its own, does not enact an appraisal, since nothing is assessed positively or negatively.
On the other hand, the clause
She was pleasantly surprised that the answer was thirteen
both
- construes a process of emotion (was surprised), and
- enacts a positive appraisal of that emotion by reference to a Quality of emotion (pleasantly), and so constitutes an instance of affect.
Halliday & Matthiessen (1999: 7):
The ideational metafunction is concerned with construing experience — it is language as a theory of reality, as a resource for reflecting on the world. The interpersonal metafunction is concerned with enacting interpersonal relations through language, with the adoption and assignment of speech roles, with the negotiation of attitudes, and so on — it is language in the praxis of intersubjectivity, as a resource for interacting with others.
Tuesday, 10 September 2019
What Is A Connotative Semiotic?
Applied to SFL theory, the expression plane (signifier) of language and the content plane (signified) of language together constitute a denotative semiotic. And language as a denotative semiotic is the expression plane (signifier) of the culture as semiotic system (signified). It is this relation between language and culture that constitutes a connotative semiotic.
connotative semiotic (culture ↘ language)
connotative semiotic (culture ↘ language)
signified
|
culture as content
|
signifier
|
language as expression
|
denotative semiotic (language)
signified
|
content plane of language
|
signifier
|
expression plane of
language
|
Note that Martin, while claiming to be 'following Hjelmslev' (1992: 493), misinterprets varieties of the content of a denotative semiotic — genre, register — as (the content of) a connotative semiotic.
Labels:
Clarification,
Connotative Semiotic,
Critique,
Genre,
Hjelmslev,
Jim Martin,
Register,
Stratification
Monday, 9 September 2019
Tuesday, 3 September 2019
The Undoubted Importance Of Jim Martin's Opinion
For my part, after thinking about several exchanges on the list and off, it seems to me that having plenary talks in languages other than English matters far more for people for whom it matters than not being able to follow such talks matters for people who wouldn’t be able to follow them… and so we should defer to the people for whom this matters most.
Monday, 2 September 2019
Predictive Text
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)